Private AI for medical-affairs teams.

Find the evidence gap in a specialist review

Extract supplied facts, detect incomplete fields and compare evidence against specialist-maintained checks.

Inputs: Authorised submissions, safety-case administration, policy requirements and review records.

From observation to completed task

Create reviewer tasks and track approved follow-ups with source references.

Draft an internal evidence-brief outline from approved literature

The supporting records include authorised studies, approved response material and review notes.

Medical reviewers validate evidence and external communications.

The systems involved

Validated case or quality-system interfaces and restricted health information.

SOS AI configures the local models and tool permissions for this workflow. Actions in business software follow the authority you approve; uncertain cases and actions outside those limits go to the responsible person.

What a useful result must get right

Qualified reviewers decide causality, coverage and regulatory conclusions; no automated medical judgments.